It's a lie, we didn't endorse Magu - Transparency International

Friday, 24 March 2017 04:02

It's a lie, we didn't endorse Magu - Transparency International

font size decrease font size increase font size
Print
Email

Rate this item

(0 votes)

Recent reports that Transparency International (TI) in the United Kingdom had endorsed acting Chairman of Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) Ibrahim Magu has proven to be false.

A statement issued by the anti-corruption body, EFCC, had said that the international anti-corruption monitor had endorsed Magu as an anti-corruption icon.

The statement of the EFCC had come on the heels of the rejection of Magu by the Senate as the nominee for confirmation to head the commission.

However, in a statement by TI announcing the event which Magu was invited to, it was categorically stated that the invitation was not an endorsement by the world body.

TI-UK, according to the News Agency of Nigeria (NAN), stated in its website that it had to clarify that inviting Magu did not constitute an endorsement as reported in the Nigerian media.

“In light of reports in Nigerian press, TI-UK would like to clarify the following points:

“The event is being hosted by Transparency International UK, Global Witness and The Corner House.

“This event does not constitute an official follow-up to the London Anti-Corruption Summit, hosted by the UK government in May 2016

“The purpose of this event is to contribute to the discussion about the effectiveness of the UK-Nigerian asset recovery process, and more generally the UK’s asset recovery regime.

“All invited guests speak on behalf of either themselves or the organisation they represent – their participation does not represent an endorsement by TI-UK", it said.

Last week, the Senate rejected Magu’s nomination following a report by the Department of State Services (DSS) which alleged that he would constitute a liability to the anti-corruption fight of the current administration.

The security body alleged that Magu hobnobbed with individuals who were under investigation by the commission.

The report added that he (Magu) lived in a N40 million house paid for by someone being investigated by the commission.

Following this report, which was sent in October 2016 and reaffirmed last week by the DSS, the Senate rejected Magu’s nomination.

Thisday